Many organizations are investing in various initiatives to encourage people to give and receive feedback.
In the context of capability building and talent development, feedback from others is widely recognized as a critical driver of growth. By seeing ourselves through the eyes of others, we gain perspective, deepen reflection, and accelerate learning.
At the same time, feedback often comes with negative emotions such as anxiety and fear.
When a manager says, “I’d like to share some feedback,” many employees instinctively brace themselves, assuming they are about to be criticized.
As a result, it becomes difficult to receive feedback with an open mindset, and what was intended as support for growth can sometimes produce the opposite effect.
Much has been said about how to give feedback effectively. Frameworks such as the SBI model (Situation–Behavior–Impact) emphasize grounding feedback in observable facts and specific behaviors.
These approaches are certainly important.
Yet in practice, many managers still find themselves thinking: “I clearly explained what wasn’t working, but nothing changed,” or even, “That behavior seems to be happening more often.”
In many cases, this is not a problem of technique, but of human psychology.
When people are told, “That behavior isn’t good,” or “You should stop doing that,” they often respond by:
In some cases, this can even lead to a distorted form of self-affirmation—“I’m not wrong”—which reinforces the very behavior the feedback was meant to address.
In other words, feedback that focuses only on what is wrong rarely leads to meaningful behavior change.
What truly makes feedback effective is not only how it is delivered, but the intent behind it—and whether a clear picture of the desired behavior is provided.
Feedback is not about correcting someone. It is about supporting their growth and contribution.
From that standpoint, three elements are critical:
When feedback is delivered this way, it shifts from criticism to guidance that points to the next step forward.
No matter how clearly desired behaviors are articulated, feedback will only be accepted if there is trust.
Trust is built when people consistently feel that:
With that foundation in place, even corrective feedback is more likely to be received as support rather than attack.
There are situations where, despite repeated feedback, improvement does not occur and a manager must eventually acknowledge that a role may not be the right fit.
Whether such conversations can remain constructive depends largely on the trust that has been built up until that point.
In organizations where people regularly talk about:
even difficult topics can be addressed through constructive dialogue.
Over time, this practice affects not only organizational performance, but also:
What enables feedback to drive growth and performance is not technique alone.
It is not about pointing out what is wrong, nor about forcing change.
What truly matters is:
With these elements in place, feedback transforms from something people fear into a force that moves people and organizations forward.
Being able to support the growth of colleagues through feedback is not only valuable for those receiving it.
For leaders, it can become a deeply meaningful and enriching experience—one that strengthens their ability to truly engage with people.